Oregonian, The (Portland, OR)

May 4, 1991

 

 

 

CRIMINOLOGIST DETAILS FRANCKE DEATH SCENE

Author: PHIL MANZANO and JOHN SNELL of the Oregonian Staff

 

Summary: The murder trial of Frank E. Gable continues as a state police official recounts the investigation

 

An Oregon State Police criminologist played a videotape Friday in the aggravated murder trial of Frank E. Gable, revealing the stark and bloody details of the death of Oregon Corrections Director Michael Francke.

 

State police criminologist Michael Hurley also testified most of Friday about the process and techinques used to search for evidence, including a hypersensitve chemical spray that glows in the dark when it detects blood.

 

``There was a blood trail . . . there was the evidence around the body . . . that tell a story of what happened,'' Hurley said.

Gable, 31, is on trial in the Jan. 17, 1989, killing of Francke and, if convicted of aggravated murder, could face the death penalty.

 

Prosecutors believe Francke was killed about 7 p.m. as he approached his car after leaving the Corrections Department headquarters in the Dome Building on the Oregon State Hospital grounds.

 

Prosecutors have said they intend to show that while there is no physical evidence linking Gable or anyone else to the killing, statements he made to friends and fellow members of the Salem drug underworld -- coupled with an eyewitness who said he saw Gable stab Francke -- are enough to convict him.

 

During opening statements Wednesday, Sarah Moore, a Marion County deputy district attorney, told the jury that crime scene experts will testify that blood drops found at the scene will reveal which direction and how fast Francke was moving after he suffered a mortal stab wound to the chest.

 

Hurley, assistant director of the State Police Crime Lab in Springfield, began laying the foundation for prosecution theories with a videotape that began showing tow-truck drivers carefully taking Francke's car away.

 

The tape then showed where the first drops of blood were found on a narrow sidewalk in front of the north portico of the Dome Building. The drops continued on a set of stairs that lead to the portico and finally Francke's body at the base of a side door.

 

The video, played without sound, spoke volumes about Francke's final moments.

 

Hurley narrated the tape, pointing out Francke's eyeglasses and car keys on the ground, a bloody handprint near the door and Francke's shirt, saturated with blood.

 

He told jurors about a small windowpane, the size of a paperback book, close to the doorknob that was broken, blood smears and dirt on Francke's left hand and a badly damaged and bloody right hand.

 

From the inside of the Dome Building, the tape revealed to jurors glass fragments strewn six to eight feet on the floor. There were blood smears on the door and a section of skin stuck to the window indicating ``an obvious attempt by the victim reaching in to open the door,'' Hurley said.

 

The videotape showed Hurley and two morticians placing the body in a body bag lined with a white sheet. The tape ends with aerial shots of the Dome Building.

The crime experts are bound to be questioned closely by Gable's lawyers.

 

During cross examination of the first police officers and paramedics to arrive on the scene, defense attorney Robert Abel tried to show they may have trampled important evidence because they didn't secure the area between Francke's body and his car.

 

Defense attorney John Storkel told jurors during opening statements that investigators failed to take Francke's body temperature after the body was discovered. He said this failure made it impossible to pinpoint the time of Francke's death.

 

Forensic pathologists often take a series of three core body temperatures at one-hour intervals and then extrapolate to determine the approximate time of death.

 

Conceivably, the temperature might have been taken elsewhere, or might not have been taken at all if investigators believed that all heat had already left Francke's body after having spent hours in the cold January air.

 

Hurley said he arrived at the Dome Building about 4:40 a.m. Jan. 18, about five hours after Francke's body was discovered. It was cold, damp and dark and after inspecting the crime scene Hurley said he decided to wait until daylight to begin processing the scene for blood, fingerprints and other evidence.

 

``You don't always know the manner of death'' when police arrive at the crime scene, Hurley told Marion County deputy district attorney Tom Bostwick. ``The best thing to do if you can is wait until light. If you can wait until conditions are best, that's what you do, that's what we did in this case.''

 

The criminalists, Hurley said, did examine the inside of the Dome Building about 5 a.m. for about two hours. They searched the building and examined Francke's locked office but found nothing unusual.

They spent 3 1/2 -hours processing the outside crime scene which included Francke's car. No blood and no sign of a struggle was found in or around the car.

 

Hurley told jurors about using a highly sensitive chemical spray that glows when it detects trace amounts of blood, even days or weeks after the crime. The chemical interacts with iron particles left from the blood, but is not exact because it will also detect iron particles from other substances.

 

Hurley said he returned to the crime scene the evening of Jan. 27 after arranging to have all the lights around the Dome Building extinguished for the test.

 

Beginning where Francke's body was found, Hurley sprayed the substance on the door frame and floor, which resulted in the tell-tale glow, Hurley said. He worked backward, down the stairs and on the sidewalk, and was able to pick up traces of Francke's blood, even though some of it had been walked over and scrubbed off.

 

He tested the area where Francke's car was parked, but found no trace of blood. Hurley also tested a grassy strip between the portico and the area where Francke parked, but the whole strip glowed because of iron from a fertilizer, he said.

 

Earlier in the day, Abel, who claims the police botched the initial investigation, objected to the testimony of an Oregon State Police trooper. Abel said he hadn't been given a copy of the policeman's notes until early Friday morning, violating the rules for sharing evidence.

 

``I believe the issue we are confronting . . . could be critical,'' Abel said. ``We are attempting to show that police who were initially investigating the scene on Jan. 18 . . . did not properly perform their duties. They impeded the progress of their investigation and as a result may have destroyed evidence that would have been beneficial to the defense.''

Bostwick told West that his office only learned Thursday of the existence of three pages of notes dealing with a police search of a garbage dumpster.

 

West allowed Berning to testify, and he told jurors that police went through all the garbage that was picked up from the area of the Corrections Departmenton the day of the killing, but no weapon or anything important was found.